Communication in the medical field: problems and approaches

16 червня 2023
1651
Спеціальності :
Резюме

Communication is an action, but also a fundamental need that every person realizes every day. It is a simple and everyday element of our lives, but with a complex and extensive network of influences. The purpose of the study is to analyze communication in the medical field, the importance of patient participation in this process, and to assess the alignment of existing models with the goals and approaches of medical education. The results showed that communication directly affects the quality of life and fate of the patient, from the possibility of encouraging him to receiving specific information from him. Favorable conditions for medical practice, which takes place in an organized and structured context due to medical self-governance, are of great importance both for the individual activity of a doctor and in terms of his social function. The consultative model of medical communication is considered to be the most effective at the doctor-patient level. At all stages of communication, the doctor should ensure the patient’s freedom of choice. A literature review has shown that physicians should learn, develop and maintain communication skills throughout their lives.

References

  • 1. Tindle K., David A., Carlisle S. et al. (2020) Relationship of the built environment on nursing communication patterns in the emergency department: A task performance and analysis time study. J. Emerg. Nurs., 46(4): 440–448. doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2020.04.005.
  • 2. Butow P., Hoque E. (2020) Using artificial intelligence to analyse and teach communication in healthcare. The Breast, 50: 49–55. doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.008.
  • 3. Sato A., Honda K., Ono K. et al. (2020) Reviews on common objectives and evaluation indicators for risk communication activities from 2011 to 2017. PeerJ., 8: e9730.
  • 4. Yashadhana A., Fields T., Blitner G. et al. (2020) Trust, culture and communication: determinants of eye health and care among Indigenous people with diabetes in Australia. BMJ Global Health, 5(1): e001999. dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001999.
  • 5. Hildenbrand G.M., Perrault E.K., Keller P.E. (2020) Evaluating a health literacy communication training for medical students: Using plain language. J. Health Communication, 25(8): 624–631. doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1827098.
  • 6. Liu Q., Zheng Z., Zheng J. et al. (2020) Health communication through news media during the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in China: digital topic modeling approach. J. Med. Int. Res., 22(4): e19118. doi.org/10.2196/19118.
  • 7. Shaarani I., El-Kantar A., Hamzeh N. et al. (2020) Interprofessional communication of physicians using whatsapp: physicians’ perspective. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(10): 1257–1264. doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0216.
  • 8. Page M., Crampton P., Viney R. et al. (2020) Teaching medical professionalism: a qualitative exploration of persuasive communication as an educational strategy. BMC Med. Education, 20(1): 1–11. dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1993-0.
  • 9. Ortega P., Prada J. (2020) Words matter: Translanguaging in medical communication skills training. Perspect. Med. Educat., 9: 251–255. doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00595-z.
  • 10. Karnieli-Miller O. (2020) Reflective practice in the teaching of communication skills. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(10): 2166–2172. doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.021.