Effectiveness of different methods of correction of acquired ametropia after cataract, refractive and vitreoretinal surgery

March 24, 2026
57
УДК:  617.741-004.1:617.713-089:621.375.826:617.735-08
Specialities :
Resume

Frequent cases of residual ametropia after ophthalmic surgical procedures indicate the relevance of performing a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of enhancement for acquired ametropia following cataract, refractive, and vitreoretinal surgery. The study, conducted between 2022 and 2025 at the medical center «Ochi Clinic», included 353 eyes of 353 patients with clinically significant acquired ametropia after ophthalmic surgical interventions. Patients were divided into four groups depending on the enhancement method: optical correction (150 eyes), intraocular lens exchange (60 eyes), laser keratorefractive enhancement (126 eyes), and implantation of an additional intraocular lens of the add-on type (17 eyes). All patients underwent standardized ophthalmological examination with assessment of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, as well as biometric and corneal topographic parameters. The best functional and refractive outcomes were obtained in the laser enhancement group: uncorrected distance visual acuity at 6 months was 0.90±0.11, and the manifest refraction spherical equivalent was 0.12±0.49 diopters. Intraocular lens exchange and add-on intraocular lens implantation also provided significant improvement in visual function and refractive outcomes. Optical correction demonstrated the lowest efficacy index but maintained a high safety profile. Laser keratorefractive enhancement proved to be the most effective and predictable method for the correction of acquired ametropia, whereas intraocular lens exchange and add-on intraocular lens implantation represent appropriate alternatives for patients with significant residual refractive error or contraindications to laser procedures.

References

  • 1. Olsen T. (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol., 85(5): 472–485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x.
  • 2. Hoffer K.J. (2017) Biometry of the eye. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 174: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.010.
  • 3. Wang L., Koch D.D. (2021) Residual refractive error after cataract surgery: prevention and management. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol., 32(1): 54–59. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000763.
  • 4. Hill W., Abulafia A., Barrett G. (2017) Intraocular lens power calculation. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol., 28(1): 30–36. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000336.
  • 5. Kane J.X., Van Heerden A., Atik A., Petsoglou C. (2016) Accuracy of intraocular lens power formulas. Ophthalmology, 123(10): 2030–2038. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.026.
  • 6. Cooke D.L., Cooke T.L. (2016) Comparison of intraocular lens formulas. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg., 42(11): 1611–1620. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.036.
  • 7. Aristodemou P., Knox Cartwright N.E., Sparrow J.M., Johnston R.L. (2011) Intraocular lens formula accuracy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg., 37(1): 63–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.037.
  • 8. Wang L., Hill W., Koch D.D. (2011) Evaluation of intraocular lens formulas in long eyes. Ophthalmology, 118(3): 409–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.029.
  • 9. Savini G., Hoffer K.J., Carbonelli M. et al. (2011) Influence of corneal measurements on intraocular lens power calculation. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg., 38(4): 720–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.037.
  • 10. Novis C. (2000) Astigmatism and toric intraocular lens rotation. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg., 26(1): 61–66. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00365-2.
  • 11. Abdelghany A.A., Alió J.L. (2014) Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery. Clin. Ophthalmol., 8: 1967–1978. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S34033.
  • 12. Goggin M. (2015) Management of residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 43(7): 662–669. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12545.
  • 13. Patel V. et al. (2023) Intraocular lens exchange: indications, outcomes and complications. Clin. Ophthalmol., 17: 317–325. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S392154.
  • 14. Davis D., Brubaker J., Espandar L. et al. (2012) Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation. Ophthalmology, 119(11): 2315–2320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.017.
  • 15. Schallhorn S.C. et al. (2020) Outcomes of excimer laser enhancements after cataract surgery. Clin. Ophthalmol., 14: 2363–2372. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S103884.
  • 16. Moshirfar M. et al. (2021) Refractive enhancements after cataract surgery. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol., 32(4): 305–312. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000716.
  • 17. Gundersen K.G. (2020) Secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation. Clin. Ophthalmol., 14: 285–292. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S144675.
  • 18. Karjou Z. et al. (2021) Secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation for residual ametropia. Clin. Ophthalmol., 15: 191–198. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S292870.
  • 19. Fernández-Buenaga R. et al. (2013) IOL exchange, piggyback lens or LASIK for residual refractive error. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg., 39(11): 1734–1738. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.049.
  • 20. Khoramnia R. et al. (2022) Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery and management of residual refractive error. J. Clin. Med., 11(3): 658. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030658.
  • 21. Savini G., Hoffer K.J. (2020) Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous refractive surgery. Eye Vis., 7: 33. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-020-00193-0.
  • 22. Abulafia A., Barrett G.D. (2020) Intraocular lens calculation in challenging cases. Ophthalmology, 127(6): e61–e62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.12.014.
  • 23. Reinstein D.Z., Archer T.J., Gobbe M. (2014) Small incision lenticule extraction outcomes. J. Cataract. Refract Surg., 40(12): 2003–2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.031.
  • 24. Savini G. et al. (2021) Accuracy of toric intraocular lenses. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg., 47(2): 147–155. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000407.
  • 25. Wang L., Koch D.D. (2021) New concepts in intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmology, 128(9): e101–e102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.018.