The extent of venous reflux in the great saphenous vein of patients with chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremities and its impact on surgical tactics

September 19, 2025
833
УДК:  616.147.3-007.64:616.14-008.64]-089.15
Specialities :
Resume

Objective: to study the extent of venous reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV) in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) of the lower extremities at different stages of the disease and the possibility of its influence on surgical tactics.

Materials and methods. The study included of 43 patients with CVI of the lower extremities (47 limbs) treated in the surgical department of the Yu. Lypa Lviv Regional Veterans Hospital. The average age of patients was 47 years. There were 40 (85.1%) class C2–C3 patients and 7 (14.9%) class C4–C6 according to the clinical classification of CEAP. The patients underwent endovenous laser ablation of the GSV in the segment with venous reflux and miniphlebectomy of varicose branches under totally local anesthesia.

Results. In the vast majority of patients, venous reflux was determined only to the border of the upper and middle third of the tibia — 27 (57.4%) limbs, and along the entire length (axial) in only 3 (6.4%) limbs. In 5 (10.6%) limbs, venous reflux was determined only to the middle third of the thigh, in 4 limbs (8.5%) to the lower third of the thigh, in 3 limbs (6.4%) to the knee level, and in 5 (10.6%) to the lower third of the shin. In accordance with the ultrasound picture and the extent of the venous reflux in the GSV, endovenous laser ablation was performed in their insufficient segments only, preserving the distal unaffected segments.

Conclusions. Targeted ultrasound study of the extent of the venous reflux in the GSV in patients with CVI of the lower extremities allows endovenous laser ablation to be performed in the insufficient segments of the vein only, while preserving the unaffected ones and reducing the traumatic nature of the interventions without reducing their effectiveness.

References

  • 1. Antignani P.L. et al. (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of chronic venous disease in lower limbs. Phlebology, 31(5): 300–310.
  • 2. Ohtake T., Minami T. (2018) Efficacy of segmental endovenous laser ablation in varicose veins. J. Vascular. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord., 6(2): 207–214.
  • 3. ​Gloviczki P., Dalsing M.C., Mattos M.A. et al. (2019) The American Venous Forum/Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for the management of chronic venous disease: A systematic review. J. Vascular. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord., 7(2): 297–313. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.10.027.
  • 4. Labropoulos N., Tassopoulou S., Kang H. (2020) The role of duplex ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of chronic venous disease. Phlebology, 35(4): 239–246.
  • 5. Meissner M.H., Gloviczki P. (2018) Clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification of chronic venous disorders. In P. Gloviczki (Ed.), Handbook of Venous Disorders: Guidelines of the American Venous Forum, 4th ed., 11–23 pp.
  • 6. Perrin M., Ramelet A.A. (2016) Clinical manifestations of venous insufficiency: A clinical study of 1022 patients. Int. Angiol., 35(1): 1–8.
  • 7. Myers K.A., Clough A.C. (2015) Stripping of the long saphenous vein. In A. B. King & C. V. L. Williams (Eds.), Surgical Treatment of Venous Disease, 115–132 pp.
  • 8. Rass K., Frings N., Busch M. (2019) Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Vasc. Surg., 69(1): 220–229. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.216.
  • 9. Haddad N. (2017) Radiofrequency ablation versus high ligation and stripping for great saphenous vein incompetence: A single center experience. Ann. Vasc. Surg., 40: 246–251. doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.016.
  • 10. Lattimer C.R., Vasquez M.A. (2018) The role of saphenous-sparing surgery. In: C.R. Lattimer & J.V.L. King (Eds.), Saphenous Vein Sparing Surgery for Varicose Veins, 53–65 pp.
  • 11. Kasper K. (2021) The importance of duplex ultrasound in planning varicose vein surgery. Vasc. Med., 26(1): 81–86. doi.org/10.1177/1358863X20963590.
  • 12. Davies A.H. (2020) The management of chronic venous disease: The evidence base. Br. Med. Bull., 133(1): 29–41. doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa006.
  • 13. Гончаренко О.В., Коваленко І.С. (2019) Сучасні підходи до лікування хронічної венозної недостатності нижніх кінцівок. Укр. хір. журн., 27(3): 45–52.
  • 14. Gloviczki P. et al. (2017) The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines. J. Vasc. Surg., 65(1): 3S–67S.
  • 15. Mansilha A. et al. (2020) Ultrasound-guided segmental ablation for varicose veins: Long-term outcomes. Phlebology, 35(5): 343–350.
  • 16. Марченко В.М. (2021) Ендовенозна лазерна абляція у лікуванні хронічної венозної недостатності. Вісн. хірургії України, 30(1): 22–29.