Dynamics of pain intensity and psychoemotional disorders in patients with tension-type headache when using osteopathic manipulative therapy

May 8, 2025
171
УДК:  616.831-009.7:616.8-008.64]-07-085.828-035
Specialities :
Resume

The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between the intensity of tension-type headache and the level of anxiety and depression in patients before and after osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMT), in order to assess the psycho-emotional component of the clinical response and the feasibility of including osteopathic therapy in the complex treatment of tension-type headache.

Materials and methods. We examined and treated 96 patients aged (43.0±10.2) years. The intensity of headache was determined by VAS, anxiety and depression — by HADS. An analysis was performed to determine the significance and strength of the relationship, the direction of association, and the prognostic value of the components.

Results. OMT was performed according to an individually developed complex for each patient. Statistical analysis before treatment revealed a statistically significant moderate association between headache intensity and anxiety/depression. After OMT, there was a decrease in both headache intensity and anxiety and depression caused by it. The association of headache and anxiety after treatment was statistically significant, although there was no trend between the increase in pain and anxiety after treatment. However, the association of pain with depression remained significant with moderate strength of association. There was a statistically significant reduction in headache intensity (p<0.001) and anxiety (p=0.005) and depression (p=0.016) as a response to OMT.

Conclusion. The level of depression depends more on the severity of pain than anxiety. The presence of clinically manifested anxiety and depression is often associated with more severe pain. According to the analysis, it was determined that OMT is quite successful in reducing both the intensity of headache and the level of anxiety/depression. However, in patients with clinically severe anxiety and depression, additional therapeutic measures and examinations are needed to identify the causes of severe mental disorders.

References

  • 1. Al-Khazali H.M., Al-Sayegh Z., Younis S. et al. (2024) Systematic review and meta-analysis of Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with migraine and tension-type headache. Cephalalgia, 44(8): 3331024241274266.
  • 2. Deuschl G., Beghi E., Fazekas F. et al. (2020) The burden of neurological diseases in Europe: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Public Health, 5(10): e551–e567. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30190-0.
  • 3. Steiner T.J., Husøy A., Stovner L.J. (2024) GBD2021: headache disorders and global lost health — a focus on children, and a view forward. J. Headache Pain, 25(1): 91.
  • 4. Fuensalida-Novo S., Palacios-Ceña M., Fernández-Muñoz J.J. et al. (2017) The burden of headache is associated to pain interference, depression and headache duration in chronic tension type headache: a 1-year longitudinal study. J. Headache Pain, 18(1): 119. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0829-8.
  • 5. Jensen R.H. (2018) Tension-type headache — the normal and most prevalent headache. Headache, 58(2): 339–345. doi: 10.1111/head.13067.
  • 6. Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C., Arendt-Nielsen L. (2017) Improving understanding of trigger points and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in tension-type headache patients: clinical implications. Expert Rev. Neurother., 17(9): 933–939.
  • 7. Palacios-Ceña M., Wang K., Castaldo M. et al. (2018) Trigger points are associated with widespread pressure pain sensitivity in people with tension-type headache. Cephalalgia, 38(2): 237–245. doi: 10.1177/0333102416679965.
  • 8. González de la Flor Á., García Pérez de Sevilla G., Domíngez Balmaseda D. et al. (2022) Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Headache Impact, Anxiety, and Physical Activity Levels in Patients with Chronic Tension-Type Headache: An Observational Study. Behav Neurol., 8387249. doi: 10.1155/2022/8387249.
  • 9. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia, 38(1): 1–211.
  • 10. Чоповський Д. (2023) Сучасний погляд на хронічний неспецифічнийм’язовий біль у спині. Public Health J., 4: 101–107. doi: 10.32782/PUB.HEALTH.2023.4.15.
  • 11. Zigmond A.S., Snaith P. (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand., 67(6): 361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
  • 12. Tamburella F., Piras F., Piras F. et al. (2019) Cerebral Perfusion Changes After Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: A Randomized Manual Placebo-Controlled Trial. Front Physiol., 10: 403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00403.
  • 13. Мурашко Н.К., Яременко О.Б., Барінов О.М. та ін. (2013) Больовий синдром як міждисциплінарна проблема: Навчально-методичні рекомендації.
  • 14. Everit B.S., Skrondal A. (2006) The Cambrige Dictionary of Statistic. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, 480 p.
  • 15. Mantonakis L., Belesioti I., Deligianni C.I. et al. (2024) Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Headache Disorders: An Observational, Cross-Sectional Study. Neurol. Int., 16(2): 356–369. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16020026.
  • 16. Zhang Y., Huang W., Pan S. et al. (2023) New management strategies for primary headache disorders: Insights from P4 medicine. Heliyon, 9(11): e22285.
  • 17. Nestoriuc Y., Martin A., Rief W., Andrasik F. (2008) Biofeedback treatment for headache disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 33(3): 125–140. doi: 10.1007/s10484-008-9060-3.
  • 18. Magnavita N. (2022) Headache in the Workplace: Analysis of Factors Influencing Headaches in Terms of Productivity and Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19(6): 3712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063712.