Prognosing the severity of the myasthenia gravis

September 27, 2019
644
Resume

The aim — to develop a prognostic model of the severe course (SC) of myasthenia gravis (MG) taking into account the clinical manifestations and the immunological type of the disease. Materials and methods. 182 patients with MG were examined (147 (80.8%) with a generalized, 35 (19.2%) with ocular form of the disease). To assess the clinical form, class, and subclass of MG, the MGFA classification was used. The severity of MG was quantified on a QMG scale. The level of antibodies to acetylcholine receptors (AchR-AB) and to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK-AB) and the presence of antibodies to titin and SOX1 were assessed. The quality of life was assessed on the MGQОL-15, daily acti­vity — on the MG-ADL, the level of fatigue — on the FSS scale. Results. AchR-AB were found in 124 (68.1%) patients (73.5% with generalized and 45.7% with the ocular form), to MuSK — in 16 (8.8%), to titin — in 53 (29.1%), to SOX1 — in 10 (5.5%) patients. The average MG-ADL score in the total sample was 5.0 (3.0–8.0), the FSS score — 43.0 (30.0–54.0), the MGQOL-15 score — 21.5 (9.0–33.0) points. According to ROC-analysis, it was found that out of all assessed indicators, the titer of AchR-AB has the best operational characteristics (the highest sensitivity and specificity, AUC), its ability to predict the SC of MG is very good (sensitivity 70.59; specificity 90.30; AUC 0.835; p<0.001) and it can be used to predict the SC of MG (>17 points on the QMG scale). If the titer level of AchR-AB is >6.9 nmol/L, the odds ratio of the SC of MG in patients with MG compared to those who have a titer level of AchR-AB below this level is 22.35 (95% confidence interval 6.98–71.56; p<0.001. The SC of MG (>17 points on the QMG scale), according to the rank correlation analysis, is associated with the titer of AchR-AB (ρ=0.34; p<0.001), with the MGQOL-15 score (ρ=0.41; p<0.001), MG-ADL score (ρ=0.41; p<0.001), FSS score (ρ=0.36; p<0.001). Conclusion. An AchR-AB >6.9 nmol/L is a predictor of SC of MG. The prognostic value of the titer of MuSK-AB, of the presence of antibodies to titin, to SOX1 for severe MG has not been established.

Published: 27.09.2019
References:

  • Kalbus O.I. (2019a) ImunologIchnI markeri rozvitku mIastenIYi. Ukr. med. chasopis, 2(2)(130): 24—26.
  • Kalbus O.I. (2019b) Mediko-statistichnI ta epIdemIologIchnI harakteristiki poshirenostI mIastenIYi v UkraYinI. Ukr. med. chasopis, 4(2)(132): 42—45.
  • Akcam T., Ozdil A., Kavurmaci O. et al. (2017) The effect of preoperative AchR-AB level to the prognosis in operated myasthenia gravis patients. Open J. Thorac. Surg., 07(04): 62–69.
  • Andersen J.B., Heldal A.T., Engeland A., Gilhus N.E. (2014) Myasthenia gravis epidemiology in a national cohort; combining multiple disease registries. Acta Neurol. Scandinav., 198: 26–31.
  • Aurangzeb S., Tariq M., Irshad M. et al. (2009) Relationship between anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody titres and severity of myasthenia gravis. J. Pak. Med. Assoc., 59(5): 289–292.
  • Barohn R., Mcintire D., Herbelin L. et al. (1998) Reliability testing of the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Scorea. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 841(1): 769–772.
  • Bartoccioni E., Scuderi F., Minicuci G. et al. (2006) Anti-MuSK antibodies: Correlation with myasthenia gravis severity. Neurology, 67(3): 505–507.
  • Blum S., Lee D., Gillis D. et al. (2015) Clinical features and impact of myasthenia gravis disease in Australian patients. J. Clin. Neurosci., 22(7): 1164–1169.
  • Breiner A., Widdifield J., Katzberg H.D. et al. (2016) Epidemiology of myasthenia gravis in Ontario, Canada. Neuromusc. Dis., 26(1): 41–46.
  • Burns T., Sadjadi R., Utsugisawa K. et al. (2016) International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r. Muscle Nerve, 54(6): 1015–1022.
  • Carr A.S., Cardwell C.R., McCarron P.O., McConville J. (2010) A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis. BMC Neurol., 10: 46.
  • Engel A.G. (Ed.) (2012) Myasthenia gravis and myasthenic disorders (2 ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 304 p.
  • Jaretzki A., Barohn R.J., Ernstoff R.M. et al. (2000) Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology 55: 16–23.
  • Kulaksizoglu I. (2007) Mood and anxiety disorders in patients with myasthenia gravis: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. CNS Drugs, 21: 473–481.
  • Nagappa M., Mahadevan A., Gangadhar Y. et al. (2019) Autoantibodies in acquired myasthenia gravis: сlinical phenotype and immunological correlation. Acta Neurol. Scandinav., 139(5): 428–437.
  • Romi F., Skeie G., Aarli J., Gilhus N. (2000) The severity of myasthenia gravis correlates with the serum concentration of titin and ryanodine receptor antibodies. Arch. Neurol., 57(11): 1596–600.
  • Šimundić A.M. (2009) Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions. EJIFCC, 19(4): 203–211.
  • Vinge L., Jakobsen J., Andersen H. (2018) Muscle weakness and functional disability in patients with myasthenia gravis. Musc. Nerv., 59(2): 218–223.
  • Wolfe G., Herbelin L., Nations S. et al. (1999) Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile. Neurology, 52(7): 1487–1487.