- 1. Ashina M., Buse D.C., Ashina H. et al. (2021) Migraine: integrated approaches to clinical management and emerging treatments. Lancet, 397: 1505–1518.
- 2. Robblee J., Minen M.T., Friedman B.W. et al. (2026) 2025 guideline update to acute treatment of migraine for adults in the emergency department: The American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies. Headache, 66(1): 53–76. doi: 10.1111/head.70016.
- 3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3).
- 4. UpToDate. Acute treatment of migraine in adults.
- 5. Silberstein S.D., Rosenberg J. (2000) Multispecialty consensus on diagnosis and treatment of headache. Neurology, 54: 1553.
- 6. Silberstein S.D. (2000) Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 55: 754.
- 7. International Headache Society (2024) IHS publishes Global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine.
- 8. Puledda F., Sacco S., Diener H.C. et al. (2024) International Headache Society global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia, 44(8). doi: 10.1177/03331024241252666.
- 9. Gungor F., Akyol K.C., Kesapli M. et al. (2016) Intravenous dexketoprofen vs placebo for migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cephalalgia, 36(2): 179–184. doi: 10.1177/0333102415584604.
- 10. Karacabey S., Sanri E., Yalcinli S. et al. (2018) Which is more effective for the treatment of Acute Migraine Attack: Dexketoprofen, Ibuprofen or Metoclopramide? Pak. J. Med. Sci., 34(2): 418–423. doi: 10.12669/pjms.342.13815.
- 11. Allais G., Rolando S., Schiapparelli P. et al. (2013) Frovatriptan plus dexketoprofen in the treatment of menstrually related migraine: an open study. Neurol. Sci., 34(Suppl. 1): S179–S181. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1390-0.
- 12. Allais G., Bussone G., Tullo V. et al. (2015) Frovatriptan 2.5 mg plus dexketoprofen (25 mg or 37.5 mg) in menstrually related migraine. Subanalysis from a double-blind, randomized trial. Cephalalgia, 35(1): 45–50. doi: 10.1177/0333102414542290.
- 13. Mauleón D., Artigas R., García M.L. et al. (1996) Preclinical and clinical development of dexketoprofen. Drugs, 52 (Suppl. 5): 24–45. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199600525-00005.
- 14. Rodríguez M.J., Arbós R.M., Amaro S.R. (2008) Dexketoprofen trometamol: clinical evidence supporting its role as a painkiller. Expert Rev. Neurother., 8(11): 1625–1640. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.11.1625.
- 15. Barbanoj M.J., Antonijoan R.M., Gich I. (2001) Clinical pharmacokinetics of dexketoprofen. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 40(4): 245–262. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200140040-00002.
- 16. Hanna M., Moon J.Y. (2019) A review of dexketoprofen trometamol in acute pain. Curr. Med. Res. Opin, 35(2): 189–202. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1457016.
- 17. Kuczyńska J., Pawlak A., Nieradko-Iwanicka B. (2022) The comparison of dexketoprofen and other painkilling medications (review from 2018 to 2021). Biomed Pharmacother., 149: 112819. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112819.
- 18. Mainardi F., Maggioni F., Pezzola D. et al. (2014) Dexketoprofen trometamol in the acute treatment of migraine attack: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, dose optimization study. J. Pain, 15(4): 388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.12.006.
- 19. Yavuz E., Gulacti U., Lok U. et al. (2020) Intravenous metoclopramide versus dexketoprofen trometamol versus metoclopramide + dexketoprofen trometamol in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am. J. Emerg. Med., 38(11): 2254–2258. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.038.
- 20. Şafak S., Çorbacıoğlu Ş.K., Korucu O. et al. (2022) Comparison of ibuprofen and dexketoprofen in the management of migraine-related headache in the emergency department. Notfall Rettungsmed, 25(Suppl. 2): 31–37. doi: 10.1007/s10049-022-01105-w.
|